Computer Languages |
|
|
|
Name |
proficiency |
Yrs. Exp |
Year last used |
C++ (v.3) |
8 |
4 |
99 |
C |
8 |
3 |
98 |
Java |
6 |
1 |
99 |
COM/OLE |
8 |
3 |
98 |
FORTRAN |
8 |
6 |
94 |
ActiveX |
8 |
3 |
99 |
MFC |
7 |
1 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
Operating System |
|
|
|
WinNT |
8 |
4 |
99 |
Win98 |
8 |
1 |
99 |
Win3.1 |
6 |
1 |
96 |
MS-Dos |
6 |
1 |
98 |
Unix |
7 |
3 |
96 |
Vax/Vms |
7 |
2 |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
|
|
Mech Eng |
6 |
3 |
97 |
EE |
6 |
4 |
95 |
Mil |
7 |
5 |
95 |
Internet |
7 |
2 |
99 |
Real-time |
7 |
3 |
96 |
Communications |
7 |
3 |
98 |
graphics |
8 |
4 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools |
|
|
|
Lotus Server |
5 |
|
99 |
Internet Explorer |
|
3 |
|
MS-Word |
|
3 |
98 |
Win32 api |
7 |
|
98 |
X-Windows |
|
2 |
|
OOP |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proficiency |
scale 1-10 |
|
|
1-training |
|
|
|
2-better than 20% of programmers |
|
|
|
3 able to write/debug code better than 30% of programmers |
|
|
|
4-better than 40% of programmers |
|
|
|
5 avg, better than 50% of programmers |
|
|
|
6 able to solve moderate complex issues with manual |
|
|
|
7 able to solve complex issues with manual |
|
|
|
8-able to solve complex issues without outside help |
|
|
|
9- better than 90% of other programmers in that language |
|
|
|
10-expert-able to write specs for ANSI committee, better than 99% of programmers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On C++, I scored 80% (basic-76%, inter 80%, advanced 89%) on a test (www.qtektest.com) with 1024 other candidates, where the lowest score was 20%, average 59%, highest 94%; |
|
|
|
On another C++ test, I did better than 80% of the candidates |
|
|
|
On Java, I scored 62% (basic-61%, inter-55%, advanced-75%) on a test (www.qtektest.com) with 1989 other candidates, where the lowest score was 18%, average 61%, highest 94% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Walter Heger |
|
|
|